|
In
vitro bio-efficacy of biocontrol agents and oil cakes against Pythium
aphanidermatum from tomato
B.
Madhumitha1*, S. Gnanaprakash2, C. Jayapradha1,
S. Thankappan1, S. Rathikannu1 and T. Priyanga3
1School of
Agricultural Sciences, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences,
Coimbatore-641 114, India
2ADAMA India
Private Limited, Hyderabad-500 101, India
3Department of
Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003,
India
*Corresponding
Author Email :
madhu2sucess@gmail.com *ORCiD:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8012-5203
|
|
|
Abstract
Aim:
To compare the bio-efficacy of biocontrol agents and oil cakes against Pythium
aphanidermatum causing damping off disease in tomato under in vitro
condition.
Methodology: Bioefficacy of native biocontrol agents viz.,
Trichoderma viride, Pseudomonas fluoroscens, Bacillus
subtilis and nine different oil cakes viz., castor cake, cotton cake,
coconut cake, gingelly cake, groundnut cake, mahua cake, neem cake, pungam
cake and soyabean cake were screened in vitro against damping off pathogen
through dual culture technique and Poison food technique. Data on percent
inhibition was calculated and efficient biocontrol agent / oil cake was
identified.
Results:
Results of dual culture technique revealed that under in vitro conditions,
the biocontrol agent Trichoderma viride (TV4) showed maximum per cent
inhibition of 80.15% against P. aphanidermatum the Poison Food
Technique showed that neem cake was more effective at 5% and 10% with maximum
inhibition percentage of 52.44% and 66.20%, respectively.
Interpretation: Fungal biocontrol agent T. viride
was found more efficient against tomato damping off pathogen when compared to
with oil cakes.
Key words: Biocontrol agents, Bio-efficacy, Damping off, Oil
cakes, Pythium aphanidermatum, Tomato
|
|
|
Copyright
© 2022 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the
Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior
permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and
the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely
with the author(s).
|
|