|
Assessment of
genetic diversity among Egyptian and Saudi chicken ecotypes and local
Egyptian chicken breeds using microsatellite markers
A. Sabry1,2*,
S. Ramadan3, M.M. Hassan1,4, A.A. Mohamed1,5,
A. Mohammedein1 and M. Inoue-Murayama6
1Department of
Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif-21944,
Saudi Arabia
2Cell Biology
Department, National Research Center, 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
3Department of
Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University,
Moshtohor, 13736, Egypt
4Department of
Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Menoufia University, 51132, Egypt
5Department of
Animal Reproduction and AI,National Research Center, 12622, Dokki, Giza,
Egypt
6Wildlife Research
Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8203, Japan
*Corresponding Author Email : a.sabri@tu.edu.sa
|
|
|
Abstract
Aim:
To assess genetic diversity of two chicken ecotypes from Egypt and Saudi
Arabia and compare these ecotypes to six local Egyptian and two exotic pure
chicken breeds using 14 microsatellite markers.
Methodology: Dataset consisted of two subsets. First subset
represented two ecotypes from Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Second dataset
consisted birds six Egyptian native chicken strains: Fayoumi (FAY), Dandarawy
(DAN), Baladi (BAL), Sinai (Sini), El-Salam (Els) and Golden Montazah (GG),
and two commercial strains: White Leghorn (WL) and Rhode Island Red (RIR).
fourteen microsatellites markers were utilized to assess DNA polymorphism.
Data analyses of the results were carried out using R statistical
environment.
Results:
The obtained results indicated that number of alleles per locus averaged 11.4
± 5.0. Polymorphic information content was informative (> 50%) for the
local breeds, but not for two ecotypes. The observed and expected
heterozygosity averaged 0.46 and 0.75, both ecotypes had the lowest
estimates. All breeds showed significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg
equilibrium expectation. The average population differentiation index (FST)
was 0.143, overall heterozygosity deficiency (FIT) was 0.156, and
global inbreeding of individuals within breeds (FIS) was
0.319.
Interpretation: This study revealed that both Egyptian
and Saudi ecotypes have an endangered status. Lower genetic distances and
lower FST values were reported for the Egyptian indigenous breeds.
Phylogenetic and principle components showed that both ecotypes were
genetically closer to each other when compared with other breeds. It also
showed that the Dandarawy native Egyptian chicken breed was genetically the
closest breed to both the Egyptian and Saudi ecotypes.
Key
words:
Chicken, Ecotypes, Genetic diversity, Microsatellites, Phylogenetics
|
|