JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Home
    Obituary: Dr. R. C. Dalela
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    Publication Policies
    Guidelines for Editors
    Guidelines for Reviewers
    Abstracting and Indexing
    Subscription and Payments
    Contact Journal
    About Triveni Enterprises
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Guidelines for Authors
    Terms and Conditions
    Author Resources
    Fees and Payments
    Track Paper Status
 

Google Search the Journal web-site:


    Abstract - Issue Jan 2021, 42 (1)                                     Back


nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene

Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) accessions for Fusarium wilt resistance

                                                         

A.K. Srivastava1*, G.P. Dixit1, N.P. Singh2, D.R. Saxena3, P.R. Saabale4, K.S. Raghuvanshi5 and V.P. Anandani

1Department of Plant Breeding, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India

2Department of Plant Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India

3Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, RAK College of Agriculture, Sehore-466 001, India

4Department of Plant Pathology, ICAR- IIPR Regional Research Centre cum Off Season Nursery, Dharwad-580 005, India

5Department of Plant Pathology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri- 413 722, India

6Department of Plant Pathology, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh - 362 001, India

*Corresponding Author Email : bhu.avinash@gmail.com

 

Received: 13.04.2020                                                              Revised: 17.07.2020                                                              Accepted: 24.10.2020

 

 

Abstract

Aim: The present study was conducted to evaluate chickpea breeding lines and popular varieties for Fusarium wilt resistance through multi-location field evaluation in major chickpea growing states of India.

Methodology: Forty-five chickpea accessions were evaluated for Fusarium wilt resistance in field sick plots at Kanpur, Junagadh, Sehore and Rahuri in India during 2016 and 2017. Each accession was planted in three replications in a randomized block design. The data was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) for testing the significance of variation due to accessions, environments and their interaction. GGE biplots analysis were constructed from the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) using 45 genotypes and 8 environments using statistical software R, versions 2.15.

Results: The effects of genotype, environment and G x E interaction for wilt incidence were highly significant with maximum variation caused by G x E interaction effect (50.42%), followed by genotypic (46.92 %) and environmental effect (2.24%). GGE biplot analysis revealed that Rahuri and Junagadh locations were most discriminating locations and could differentiate the wilt resistant and susceptible chickpea accession, while Kanpur was least discriminating. Junagadh was most representative followed by Sehore and Kanpur while Rahuri was least representative of the average environment. On an average, the most severe wilt incidence was observed at Junagadh, followed by Sehore, Kanpur and Rahuri over the years.          

Interpretation: Elite chickpea accessions possessing high level of fusarium wilt resistant at each location can be utilized for region specific breeding.The accessions IPC 2008-11, H 2010-05, GNG 1581, JG 24, SCGP-WR 28, H 2010-01 and IPC 2008-69 exhibited stable resistance over locations. These possessed resistance against multiple races of Fusarium wilt prevailing in the country and can be utilized as donors for disease resistance breeding.          

Key words: Chickpea, Fusarium wilt, GGE biplot, Multi-location evaluation, Stable resistance

 

 

Copyright © 2021 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).