|
Identification of
BLB resistant genes in some rice varieties for development of high yielding
bacterial leaf blight tolerant types
K. Majumder1*,
S.I. Mondal1, R. Mallick1 and T. Dasgupta2
1Department of
Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Science, University of
Calcutta, Kolkata-700 019, India
2IRDM? Faculty
Centre, School of Agriculture and Rural Development, Ramakrishna Mission
Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute, Kolkata-700103, India
*Corresponding Author Email : kasturi.majumder525@gmail.com
|
|
Abstract
Aim:
To identify bacterial leaf blight resistant genes in some rice varieties so
that these resistant varieties can be used as a good source of donor for BLB
resistant genes in genetic enhancement program.
Methodology: A total of sixty-one rice genotypes including
resistant and susceptible checks were screened in field condition by
artificial inoculation using IX020 strain of Xoo for two years
(Kharif 2016 and 2017). These varieties were also genotyped for seven SSR
markers tagged with major BLB resistant genes, i.e., Xa4, xa5, xa13
and Xa7.???
Results: In artificial screening, significant disease
development was recorded and the varieties were categorized using disease
scoring scale of IRRI, 1996 where seven cultivars exhibited resistance, while
twenty-seven were found to be moderately resistant. In genotyping, there was
distinct difference in banding position for resistant and susceptible
genotypes. Genotypes having resistant disease reaction, carrying BLB resistant
genes were identified.
Interpretation: Genotypes IR-64,
IR-68144-2b-2-2-3-1-127, Ratna, Surjamukhi, Kalinga-2, Azucena and Zheshan-2
expressed bands of RM markers closely linked to Xa4, xa5, xa13
and Xa7 BLB resistant genes and field testing also confirmed resistant
host reaction against pathogens.
Key
words:
Artificial screening, BLB resistant genes, High
yield, Oryza sativa
|
|
Copyright
? 2020 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|