JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Home
    Obituary: Dr. R. C. Dalela
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    Publication Policies
    Guidelines for Editors
    Guidelines for Reviewers
    Abstracting and Indexing
    Subscription and Payments
    Contact Journal
    About Triveni Enterprises
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Guidelines for Authors
    Terms and Conditions
    Author Resources
    Fees and Payments
    Track Paper Status
 

Google Search the Journal web-site:


    Abstract - Issue Sep 2017, 38 (5)                                     Back


nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene

Possibility of determining soil pH using visible and near-infrared

(Vis-NIR) spectrophotometry

 

Z. T?msavaş

Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, Bursa, 16059, Turkey

*Corresponding Author E-mail: zeynal@uludag.edu.tr

 

 

 

Key words

PLS regression analysis,

Reflectance,

Soil pH,

Vis-NIR spectrophotometry

 

 

 

Publication Data

Paper received : 12.09.2016

Revised received : 25.06.2017

Accepted : 27.06.2017

 

Abstract

Aim: The present study was conducted to investigate possibility of using fiber-optic visible and near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectrophotometry for determining soil pH.

 

Methodology: Diffuse reflectance spectra of 272 soil samples taken at a depth of 0-20 cm from cultivation soil in Bursa Province, Turkey, were measured in the laboratory to determine soil pH. Before apartial least square (PLS) analysis of the reflectance spectra values was conducted, all of them were randomly split into calibration (70%) and validation (30%) sets. A model for the prediction of soil pH from reflectance spectra values obtained from spectrophotometry was established using PLS regression analyses with full cross-validation.

 

Results: The regression value (R2), root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and residual prediction deviation (RPD) of established model were found to be 0.69, 0.70%, and1.413,respectively.

 

Interpretation: The results demonstrated a moderate level of success for the model in predicting soil pH.

 

 

Copyright ? 2017 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).