JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Home
    Obituary: Dr. R. C. Dalela
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    Publication Policies
    Guidelines for Editors
    Guidelines for Reviewers
    Abstracting and Indexing
    Subscription and Payments
    Contact Journal
    About Triveni Enterprises
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Guidelines for Authors
    Terms and Conditions
    Author Resources
    Fees and Payments
    Track Paper Status
 

Google Search the Journal web-site:


    Abstract - Issue Apr Supplement 2013, 34 (2)                                     Back


nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene

Removal of algae from raw water by ultrasonic irradiation

and flocculation: A pilot scale experiment

 

Guozhong Yu*, Chengmei Zhao, Bing Liu, Qingfei Li and Hui Gao

School of Urban and Environmental Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, 464000, China

*Corresponding Author email : ygz1966@163.com

 

 

 

Publication Data

Paper received:

17 June 2012

 

Revised received:

12 August 2012

 

Accepted:

29 August 2012

 

Abstract

Using Chl a removal rate as index, a 28 kHz/900w ultrasonic cleaning machine was applied to testify algal removal by ultrasonic irradiation from raw water of a pool, where Microcystis aeruginosa colonies is absolutely dominated with temperature being over 20oC, and the irradiation lasted for 5 min. PAC was used as flocculant at the dose of 60 mgl-1, jar tests were done to investigate the Chl a removal by flocculation. The results showed that ultrasound raised the water temperature instantly but did not lead to a regular pH change pattern in all the treated samples. Ultrasound could remove more than 90% of Chl a from raw water with temperature over 31oC, but less than 20% of Chl a or even increased Chl a concentration in some samples with temperature lower than 31 oC. Compared with the algal removal effects by direct raw water flocculation with PAC, ultrasound did not enhance markedly the flocculation effects on algae removal, which was not in agreement with the findings reported. The reason might be due to morphology and characteristics of natural algae differed greatly from that of algae cultured in laboratory.???????

 

Key words

Ultrasonic irradiation, Algal removal, PAC flocculation, Pilot experiment, Raw water

 

Copyright ? 2013 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).