JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Home
    Obituary: Dr. R. C. Dalela
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    Publication Policies
    Guidelines for Editors
    Guidelines for Reviewers
    Abstracting and Indexing
    Subscription and Payments
    Contact Journal
    About Triveni Enterprises
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Guidelines for Authors
    Terms and Conditions
    Author Resources
    Fees and Payments
    Track Paper Status
 

Google Search the Journal web-site:


    Abstract - Issue May 2009, 30 (3)                                     Back


Interactions between marine facultative epiphyte Chlamydomonas sp

Acute toxicity of endosulfan and malathion on Chironomus ramosus (Insecta : Diptera : Chironomidae) from north Cachar hills, Assam, India

 

T.N. Majumdar*1 and A. Gupta2

1Department of Zoology, Haflong Government College, Haflong - 788 819, India

2Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Assam University, Dorgakona Silchar - 788 011,? India

(Received: May 10, 2007; Revised received: September 28, 2007; Accepted: November 04, 2007)

Abstract: Acute toxicity tests for the pesticides endosulfan and malathion on the larvae of Chironomus ramosus were conducted. Median Lethal Concentration (LC50) values of endosulfan were 0.55 x 10-2, 0.16 x 10-2, 0.089 x 10-2 and 0.036 x 10-2 ppb respectively, while those for malathion were 0.139 x 10-2, 0.054 x 10-2, 0.019 x 10-2 and 0.0032 x 10-2 ppb respectively, at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hr. Thus Chironomus ramosus larvae were more sensitive to malathion at all hours of toxicity tests than endosulfan.

Key words: LC50, Chironomus ramosus, Endosulfan, Malathion


PDF of full length paper is available with author (* taramaj@yahoo.co.in)

 

Copyright ? 2009 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).