|
Journal of Environmental BiologypISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP |
|
Google Search the Journal web-site: |
Abstract - Issue Mar 2009, 30 (3) BackAnalysis
of the distribution of epiphytic lichens on Cedrus
libani in
Gulsah
Cobanoglu*1 and Orhan
Sevgi2 1Department of Biology,Faculty of Arts and
Science, TR-34722 2Department
of Soil Science and Ecology, Faculty of Forestry, (Received:
August 16, 2007; Revised received: November 28, 2007; Accepted: December 10,
2007) Abstract: In order to evaluate environmental
factors limiting distribution of species, diversity of epiphytic lichens was
studied in 34 sites along an altitudinal gradient from 1300 to 1900 m on
north-facing and south-facing slopes of Elmali Cedar
Research Forest (Antalya province, Turkey) regarding
the dispersion of lichens in different tree-diameter classes (0-15 cm, 15-30
cm, 30-45 cm, 45-60 cm and >75 cm). The results showed that the relationship
between diameter classes with the number of lichen species was R2=0.6022.
The highest number of species was in the diameter class of 30-45 cm. There was
a clear relationship between all parameters, diameter, altitude and aspect,
with species richness. Changes in the community structure of the epiphytic
lichen vegetation were detected along an altitudinal gradient revealing the
highest species richness in the highest zone. The elevation affected both the
number and the composition of the lichen communities and the relationship
between the altitudinal zones with number of lichen species was designated as R2=0.6462.
The number of species was higher in the north aspects than in the south aspects
in all diameter classes. The species number depending on the altitude was also
higher in the north-facing slopes than in the south-facing slopes. Key words: Epiphytic lichens, Cedrus
libani, Diameter, PDF of full length paper
is available with author (*gcoban@marmara.edu.tr) Copyright © 2009 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any
form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity
of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest
completely with the author(s). |