Dust exposures in tractor and
combine operations in eastern Mediterranean,
Turkey
Â
Ali Aybek and Selcuk Arslan*
*sarslan@ksu.edu.tr
Department of Agricultural
Machinery, College of Agriculture, Kahramanmaras Sutcuimam University,
Kahramanmaras-46060, Turkey
(Received:
January 10, 2006 ; Revised received: September 12,
2006; Accepted: October 20, 2006)
Abstract: The objective of this study was to
determine the dust concentrations in selected tractor and combine operations in
eastern Mediterranean region in Turkey.
Mean dust concentrations were 137.9 mg m-3, 83.6 mg m-3,
80.3 mg m-3, and 88.8 mg m-3 respectively for soil
packing, furrowing, straw making, and baling on tractors with no cabins whereas
106.9 mg m-3 was found in combines without cabins, which are much
higher than the limit dust concentration (10 mg m-3) considered
hazardous for workers’ health. In tractor operations with field-installed
cabins, mean dust concentrations were 5.6 mg m-3, 6.6 mg m-3,
6.4 mg m-3, and 3.7 mg m-3, respectively
in soil packing, furrowing, straw making, and baling while 4.7 mg m-3
was measured in combines with field-installed cabins. Considering unit-manufactured cabins, mean dust concentrations were 1.1 mg m-3, 1.6 mg m-3, 3.2 mg m-3, and 1.4 mg m-3
respectively in tractor operations, and 1.4 mg m-3 in combine
operations. Variance analyses showed that not only the respiration environment
of the workers but also the field operation had a significant effect on
measured dust concentrations (p<0.01). Pearson correlation coefficient was
0.74 (very strong level) between dust concentration and wind speed in soil
packing, 0.46 (medium level) between dust concentration and wind speed in
baling, and 0.44 (medium level) between dust concentration and ground speed in
combining.
Key
words: Dust
exposure, Dust measurements, Tractors, Combines, Turkey
PDF
file of full length paper is available with author
Â
Copyright
© 2007 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any
form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity
of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest
completely with the author(s).
Â