JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Home
    Obituary: Dr. R. C. Dalela
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    Publication Policies
    Guidelines for Editors
    Guidelines for Reviewers
    Abstracting and Indexing
    Subscription and Payments
    Contact Journal
    About Triveni Enterprises
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Guidelines for Authors
    Terms and Conditions
    Fees and Payments
    Track Paper Status
 

Google Search the Journal web-site:


    Abstract - Issue Sep 2020, 41 (5)                                     Back


nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene

Evaluation of total allowable catch (TAC) based fishery resources management in Korea

 

Y. Kwon1, E. Lee2, Y. Seo3, H. Kang3 and C.I. Zhang4* ? 

1Distant Water Fisheries Resources Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan, 46083, Korea

2Project Management Team, Korea Fisheries Resources Agency, Jeju-do, 63012, Korea

3Resources Management Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan 46083, Korea

4Pilot Programme, World Fisheries University, Busan, 48547, Korea

*Corresponding Author Email : cizhang@pknu.ac.kr

 

Paper received: 10.03.2020 ?????? ???????????????????????????????????????Revised received: 28.04.2020 ???????????? ???????????????????????????????Accepted: 14.08.2020

 

 

Abstract

Aim: This paper presents the efficiency and limitations of Total Allowable Catch (TAC) system, and it is intended to be used as basic research that suggests key directions of fishery resources management in Korea.

Methodology: Two major fish stocks, common mackerel (Scomber japonicus) which is a TAC target species, and small yellow croaker (Larimichthys polyactis) which is a TAC non-target species were assessed to evaluate whether TAC target stock is effectively managed by the current TAC system. The current stock status was evaluated by estimating the biomass, yield per recruit (YPR) and spawning biomass per recruit (SBPR) at current fishing mortality (F) and age at first capture (tc) for TAC target species and non-target species. Since TAC is set based on acceptable biological catch (ABC), the biomass according to ABC change was predicted when TAC system is continued to apply. It was assumed to recover habitat, and YPR and SBPR according to the increase, and decrease scenarios of nautral mortality (M) and growth rate (K) were predicted.? ??

Results: The biomass trend of TAC target species was stable, and YPR and SBPR at current F and tc were similar with YPR and SBPR at optimal F. The biomass of TAC non-target species tended to decrease rapidly, and the estimated optimal F by YPR and SBPR models was 40-50% of the current F. The biomass of TAC non-target species according to ABC was predicted doubled within 10 years, however, both species did not exceed BMSY within the next 10 years. YPR and SBPR of both TAC target and non-target species increased more when the habitat was recovered than the current F and tc change.

Interpretation: Fishery resources management by TAC system has a positive effect on the stock status, but, there was a limit to increase biomass above the target reference point level. If a species which is seriously low stock status, yield and spawning biomass were increased to adjust only F and tc. However, yield and spawning biomass of TAC target species was increased by only habitat recovery. And also, yield and spawning biomass of TAC target species were more increased when adjusted to optimal F and tc in recovered habitat. Therefore, fisheries management will be more effective if TAC is a basic management tool and a holistic ecosystem approach considering various factors such as biodiversity, habitat quality, and socio-economic benefits, is considered.?

Key words: Ecosystem-based fishery management, Spawning biomass, TAC system, Yield per recruit

 

Copyright ? 2020 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).