Host
induced genetic variation in legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata
S.
Sambathkumar1*, C. Durairaj1, S. Mohankumar2,
B. Preetha2, R. Aravintharaj2, N. Ganapathy1
and R. Surendran2
1Department of
Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641
003 India
2Department of
Plant Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003
India
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: sambathagritech@gmail.com
|
Key
words
Cluster analysis
Genetic variation
Maruca vitrata
Polymorphism
Similarity index
Publication Data
Paper received :
02.08.2016???????
Revised received :
17.12.2016???
Re-revised received :
20.02.2017
Accepted :
10.05.2017???????????
|
Abstract
Aim: The legume pod
borer, Maruca vitrata Fab. is one of the major devastating threats to legume
production in all pulse producing countries across the globe. However, it is
necessary to acknowledge the role of host plants on M. vitrata.
Methodology:
In
the present study, the influence of major pulse hosts such as pigeonpea, greengram,
blackgram, cowpea and lablab on M. vitrata was studied using RAPD,
SSR, COI and Wolbachia specific primers.? ??
Results:
The
results clearly revealed that RAPD primers produced 422 (100.0 %
polymorphism) polymorphic alleles, whereas SSR primers produced 95 polymorphic
alleles with the mean number of alleles detected / primer ranging from 9 to
16 and this showed the existence of wide genetic diversity. Dendrograms
constructed using similarity index values for RAPD and SSR primers grouped
the larval samples from above pulses into 8 and 6 clusters respectively.
Larvae of M. vitrata also yielded specific fragments with
mitochondrial COI primer (~800 bp). Additionally, presence of Wolbachia
was also confirmed with specific primers.? ????
Interpretation:
The
present study clearly indicated the existence of close proximity in the
larval population of cowpea and lablab than other hosts.
|
Copyright
? 2017 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|