JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Home
    Obituary: Dr. R. C. Dalela
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    Publication Policies
    Guidelines for Editors
    Guidelines for Reviewers
    Abstracting and Indexing
    Subscription and Payments
    Contact Journal
    About Triveni Enterprises
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Guidelines for Authors
    Terms and Conditions
    Fees and Payments
    Track Paper Status
 

Google Search the Journal web-site:


    Abstract - Issue Nov 2017, 38 (6)                                     Back


nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene

Indigenous technical knowledge in little millet cultivation among "Malayali" tribes of India

 

P. Venkatesan1* and M. Sundaramari2

1Extension Systems Management Division, ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad- 500 030, India

2Faculty of Agriculture, A.H., Gandhigram Rural Institute, Gandhigram, Dindigul- 624 302, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: venkatesan@naarm.ernet.in

 

 

 

Key words

Adoption

Indigenous knowledge

Millet cultivation

Sustainable agriculture

 

 

 

Publication Data

Paper received : 27.10.2016

Revised received : 23.12.2016

Re-revised received : 02.03.2017

Accepted : 09.03.2017

 

Abstract

Aim: Indigenous Tribal Agricultural Practices (ITAPs) has potential to significantly raise the production and sustain it in the long run. These ITAPs have more adaptability to the local situation, and hence can be used in formal advisory system. Several such useful ITAPs existent at field level is at the brink of total disappearance. Hence in the present study, the selected ITAPs of little millet were examined for their rationality and extent of adoption.

 

Methodology: The indigenous knowledge in little millet were aggregated, categorized and reported. The selected ITAPs of little millet were examined for their rationality. For assessing the rationality, twenty three ITAPs were bifurcated viz., nineteen related to crop production and four related to plant protection aspects. Further, the extent of adoption by the tribal farmers were analyzed.

 

Results: From the selected twenty three ITAPs of little millet, nineteen (82.60 %) were rational and four (17.40 %) were irrational. Sixteen ITAPs were adopted by 75 % of farmers (fourteen of them were rational and two of them were irrational), six ITAPs were adopted by 50-75 % of the respondents (five of them were rational and one was irrational) and only one ITAP was found to be irrational with low adoption (< 50%).

 

Interpretation: The rational and effective ITAPs can be incorporated into existing efforts to enhance and expand effectiveness and can also serve as the basis for new initiatives.

 

 

Copyright ? 2017 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).