Evaluating
morpho-physiological and quality traits to compliment seed yield under
changing climatic conditions in Brassicas
Pushp
Sharma* and Virender Sardana
Department
of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141
004, India
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: pushp20@yahoo.com
|
Publication
Data
Paper received:
18 March 2015
Revised received:
02 September 2015
Re-revised received:
10 October 2015
Accepted:
04 November 2015
|
Abstract
A
study was conducted under irrigated conditions to test the performance of
improved cultivars of Indian mustard (B. juncea), Gobhi sarson (B.
napus) and African sarson (B. carinata) under changing climatic
conditions. The effect of cultivar, environment and their interactions were
significant in mustard and canola gobhi sarson. Environment had significant impact
on all the studied traits except for leaf area index (LAI). Cultivar x Year
(G x Y) interaction was significant for flowering behavior, days to maturity,
SPAD,? photosynthetic active radiations (PAR), growth parameters, yield
components and yield except photosynthesis photochemical efficiency, relative
water content (RWC) and LAI. Cultivar RLC1 surpassed other B. juncea
cultivars for yield and had low erucic acid ('0') while GSL1 (non canola),
Hyola PAC401 (hybrid canola) and GSC6 (canola) of B. napus were
superior in performance for seed yield and possessed low erucic and
glucosinolate content ('00'). Higher seed yield was associated with more
number of total siliquae/plant, seed weight, biomass, seeds/siliqua, SPAD and
RWC. Correlation coefficient revealed high positive association for seed
yield with days to maturity (0.639**), plant height (0.982**),
secondary branches (0.826**), total siliquae/plant (0.913**),
seed weight (0.761**) and biomass (0.891**).
Key
words
Brassicas,
Fatty acid, Physiological traits, Yield attributes
|
Copyright
? 2016 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|