Journal of Environmental Biology

Epilithic diatoms as biological water quality indicators–A study in

three geographically isolated hill streams in India 

 

 

 

Shyam Sundar Paul, Bipul Mallik, Manjushree Mandal, Biswajit Biswas, Sanoyaz Sekh and Neera Sen Sarkar*

Phycology Section, Department of Botany, University of Kalyani, Kalyani-741 235, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: neerashen@yahoo.co.in

 

 

 

Publication Data

Paper received:

10 November 2014

 

Revised received:

01 May 2015

 

Accepted:

05 June 2015

 

Abstract

Epilithic diatoms from three geographically isolated hill streams of Central and Eastern India were studied and analysed to find their efficacy in determining difference in ecological conditions of aquatic systems. Three sampling sites (site-1, site-2 and site-3) shared commonness of being hill streams of forests with difference in source points. 34 diatom species were identified with species-richness of 17 at site 1, 10 at site 2 and 19 at site 3. Two sets of hypotheses – null (H01, H02 and H03) and alternative (HA1, HA2 and HA3) were framed. Null hypotheses were rejected in favour of alternative hypotheses. Diversity t-tests yielded significant 't' values: at a<0.0001 and <0.002, implying differences within the sampling sites. Furthermore, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon paired-sample tests were performed to test the alternative hypotheses, of which Kruskal-Wallis yielded significant difference between the sample medians with x²=5.457 at p=0.03801, and Wilcoxon paired-sample test yielded significant differences between sampling site pairs at a(2)=0.05 and 0.10. Thus significant differences could be established based only on diversity profile study of the epilithic diatoms.        Â Â 

 

 

 Key words

Bioassessment, Diversity profiles, Epilithic diatoms, Hill streams 

 

Copyright © 2016 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).