Characterization
of biochar obtained from weeds and its effect on
soil
properties of North Eastern Region of India
S. Mandal1*,
B.C. Verma2, G.I. Ramkrushna2, R.K. Singh1
and D.J. Rajkhowa2
1Division of
Agricultural Engineering, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam-793
103, India
?2Division
of Natural Resource Management, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region,
Umiam-793 103, India
*Corresponding
Authors Email : smandal2604@gmail.com
|
Publication
Data
Paper received:
03 October 2013
Revised received:
21 February 2014
Accepted:
20 June 2014
|
Abstract
In
the global climate change scenario, application of biochar in soil has become
one of the important management practices for carbon sequestration, soil
health improvement and climate change mitigation. In this study, an attempt
was made to see the effect of biochar prepared from weed biomass on soil
properties in subtropical northeast India. Biochar were prepared from seven
locally available weed biomass viz. Ageratum conyzoides, Lantana camera,
Gynura sp., Setaria sp., Avena fatua, Maize stalk, Pine needles
and were characterised. A pot experiment was conducted with maize, where
biochar was applied alone and in combination with fertilizers. Results
revealed that biochar had significant impact on soil pH, SOC, and available
nutrients like N, P and K. It also had significant impact on maize biomass
yield. All biochar contained more than 50% stable carbon. Increase in soil pH
was in the range of 0.26 to 0.3 and that of SOC from 1.62% in control to
1.74% in biochar added treatments. Biochars alone improved the available
nitrogen ranging from 4.5 to 21.3 mg kg-1, available P from 3.32
to 3.68 mg kg-1 and increased K content by 20% above control. Weed
biomass can be potential alternative to enhance soil and crop productivity
through conversion into biochar. ??
Key
words
Acid
soil, Biochar, Maize, Weed biomass
|
Copyright
? 2015 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|