Genetic
diversity of wild and cultivated genotypes of pigeonpea through RAPD and SSR
markers
Babasaheb C.
Walunjkar*, Akarsh Parihar, Nirbhay Kumar Singh and L.D. Parmar
C.P. College of
Agriculture, S.D. Agricultural University, S.K. Nagar-385 506, India
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: baba.walunjkar@gmail.com
|
Publication
Data
Paper received:
14 June 2013
Revised received:
22 December 2013
Accepted:
22 February 2014
|
Abstract
Eight
wild and four cultivated pigeonpea genotypes were subjected to RAPD and
microsatellite analysis, with 40 primers each. Out of these, eight RAPD and
five SSR primers were found polymorphic. RAPD primers showed 100%
polymorphism and produced a total of 517 DNA fragments, whereas SSR primers
produced 67 fragments and they too showed 100% polymorphism. The RAPD markers
revealed highest similarity co-efficient of 0.93 (GT-100 and ICPL-87),
whereas the highest similarity co-efficient obtained with SSR markers was
1.00 (GTH-1 and GT-100). Average PIC value obtained with RAPD and SSR were
0.90 and 0.18, respectively. The arithmetic mean heterozygosity and marker
index were 0.90 and 22.47 respectively with RAPD marker, whereas the
corresponding values for SSR markers were 0.18 and 33.66. Moreover, the four
wild genotypes (Cajanus scarabaeoides, Rhyncosia rufescence, Cajanus
cajanifolius and Rhyncosia canna) and the four cultivars (GTH-1, GT-100,
ICPL-87 and GT-1) grouped distinctly in the same subgroups of the dendrograms
obtained with both RAPD and SSR analysis. Therefore, the findings of SSR
supplement and validate the results obtained with RAPD analysis. ??
Key
words
Cluster
analysis, Fingerprinting, Microsatellites, Random primers, Redgram
|
Copyright
? 2015 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|