Google Search the Journal web-site:
|
Abstract - Issue Sep 2014, 35 (5) Back
nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene
Identification
of simple sequence repeat markers associated with wilt resistance in
pigeonpea
Ganesh D.
Khalekar1*, Amrapali A. Akhare2, Santosh J. Gahukar2,
Nirbhay Kumar Singh1 and Mithlesh Kumar1
1C.P. College of
Agriculture, S.D. Agricultural University, S.K. Nagar-385 506, India
2Biotechnology
Centre, Department of Agricultural Botany, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh
Agricultural University, Akola-444 104, India
*Corresponding
Author?s Email : gkhalekar@gmail.com
|
Publication
Data
Paper received:
20 May 2013
Revised received:
25 September 2013
Accepted:
11 October 2013
|
Abstract
The
present study was carried out with the objective of identifying markers for Fusarium
wilt resistance in pigeonpea using simple sequence repeat (SSR) and bulk segregant
analysis (BSA). The wilt resistant (ICPL 87119) and wilt susceptible
(T.Vishakha-1) genotypes were crossed and their F2 population was
used for marker analysis. Although, the parents were surveyed with 76 SSR
primers to identify the polymorphic markers, only 26 primers were found
polymorphic between the parents under study. The polymorphic information
content scores of SSR markers ranged between 0.077 to 0.333, with an average
of 0.18 per marker. These 26 primers were selected for BSA, which indicated
that five SSR primers (PFW 26, PFW 31, PFW 38, PFW 56, and PFW 70) were able
to distinguish the resistant and susceptible bulks and parents for wilt
resistance. Hence, these five SSR markers can be utilized further for
identification of wilt resistant genotypes of pigeon pea and for development
of new wilt resistant varieties of pigeonpea.
Key
words
Bulk
segregant analysis, Fusarium, Pigeonpea, Simple sequence repeat,
Wilt
|
Copyright
? 2014 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|
|