Journal of Environmental Biology

Impact of integrated nutrient management on tomato yield

under farmers field conditions

S.K. Pandey¹?and K.K. Chandra^2*

?¹Indira Gandhi National Open University, Regional Office, Darbhanga-846 004, India

²Department of Forestry,Wildlife and Environmental Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Central Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur- 495 009, India

*Corresponding Author email : kkchandra_31@rediffmail.com

Publication Data

Paper received:

31 March 2012

Revised received:

31 October 2012

Accepted:

26 December 2012

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in farmer's field of district Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh, India to assess the impact of integrated nutrient management (INM) on the performance of tomato crop during rabi (2008) and kharif (2009) season.? Before conducting trials technological gap between actual and potential productivity were analyzed by interviewing growers to find out the major causes for low yield.? Overall gap in use of fertilizers was recorded 64.90 % whereas overall mean gap in technology was 43.83 %. On-farm experiments on INM were conducted by applying FYM (10t ha^-1) + (NPK (150:80:60 kg ha^-1) followed by dipping seedling roots in1% Azotobacter solution for 15 min and foliar spray with 20 ppm ferrous ammonium sulphate after 30, 45 and 75 days of transplantation. The plant height, root length, number of primary branches, average fruit weight increased in INM plots as compared to farm practice.? The increment in yield was found to be 28.84 and 33.86 % during rabi and kharif season respectively.? The maximum marketable yield obtained in INM plot during kharif and rabi seasons was 1025 q ha^-1?and 955 q ha^-1?respectively, whereas as farm practice yielded 740 q ha^-1?and 713 q ha^-1?during the same seasons.? The percent loss from total production was recorded 8.5 % and 8.8 % in control plot and only 4.9 % and 5.7 % in INM plot during rabi and kharif seasons respectively. The higher fruit weight and lower incidence of disease and pest were observed in INM field in comparison to farm practice. The benefit cost ratio with INM treatment was recorded 4.25 and 4.23 in rabi and kharif season respectively against the benefit cost ratio of 2.98 and 2.82 in control plot during the same respective seasons.

Key words

Azotobacter, Field trial, Integrated nutrient management, Technological gap, Tomato

Copyright ? 2013 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).