Google Search the Journal web-site:
|
Abstract - Issue Jul 2013, 34 (4) Back
nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene
Population
biology of the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides
from
Goe-san lake, Korea
Ming-Ming
Zhang1, Chul-Woong
Oh1*, Wan-Ok Lee2 and Jong-Hun Na1
1Department
of Marine Biology, Pukyong National University, Busan 608-737, South Korea
2Inland
Fisheries Research Institute, Gyoenggi-do 477 815, South Korea
*Corresponding
Author email : ohcw@pknu.ac.kr
|
Publication
Data
Paper received:
23 September 2011
Revised received:
24 March 2012
Re-revised received:
11 October 2012
Accepted:
20 October 2012
|
Abstract
The
population biology of Micropterus salmoides were examined in Goe-san
Lake from March 2010 to February 2011. The development of ovary and testis
was separated into 5 stages by the criteria. The ratio of females to males
increased with total length. Females were sampled in slightly larger size and
greater number. Mean size and age was greater for females (255 mm total
length and 2.03 years, respectively) than males (227 mm and 2.44 years,
respectively). Growth was described by 3 parameter von Bertalanffy model by
otoliths as Lt =
459.01(1-exp [-0.126(t+0.416)]). The spawning season of M.
salmoides was from April to June, with a peak in May by the gonadosomatic
indices and the monthly proportions of female and male gonad stages. Ripe
females were collected during the spawning period. Mean fecundity was
27656?1424 oocytes every female. Fecundity was positively correlated with
total length, and it was described by mean fecundity 202.4 Total length ?
38188. Higher fecundity well indicated that the largemouth bass has a
flexible spawning strategy and has acclimatized well to Goe-san Lake.
Key words
Population
biology, Spawning strategy, Largemouth bass, Lake Goe-san
|
Copyright
? 2013 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|
|