nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene
Comparative studies on
antioxidant enzyme action and ion
accumulation in soybean
cultivars under salinity stress
Author Details
AnjumArshi
Department
of Botany, Faculty of Science, JamiaHamdard (HamdardUniversity),
New Delhi
- 110 062, India
AltafAhmad
Department
of Botany, Faculty of Science, JamiaHamdard (HamdardUniversity),
New Delhi
- 110 062, India
IbrahimM.Aref
Department
of Plant Production, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, KingSaudUniversity,
Riyadh
- 11451, Saudi Arabia
MuhammadIqbal
(Corresponding author)
Department of
Botany, HamdardUniversity, New
Delhi - 110 062, India
Department of
Plant Production, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, KingSaudUniversity,
Riyadh - 11451, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: iqbalg5@yahoo.co.in
Publication Data
Paper received:
19
February 2010
Revised
received:
07
November 2010
Accepted:
20 November 2010
Abstract
Plant biomass, antioxidant
enzymes activity, ions accumulation and proline
level in four soybean cultivars were investigated at different NaCl concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 mM) applied to plants 15 days after sowing. There was a
significant decrease in plant biomass and soluble protein content with each NaCl treatment. Accumulation of Na+ and Cl? was maximum in roots, followed by the stem
and leaves in all the treated cultivars; Pusa 9712
being the top accumulator. On the contrary, K+ and Ca2+
ion concentrations were inhibited in all the treated cultivars. Activities of
antioxidant enzymes (superoxidedismutase,
ascorbateperoxidase and
glutathione reductase) and proline
content increased significantly in all the cultivars with each NaCl treatment. The maximum increase was found in Pusa 9712. However, catalase
activity decreased in all the cultivars except in Pusa
9712.? On the whole, Pusa 9712 was most efficient in managing protection
against salinity stress.
Copyright ? 2012 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part
of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior
permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and
the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely
with the author(s).