JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    RnD Division
    Subscription Info
    Contact Journal
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Authoring Guidelines
    Publication Process
    Track Paper Status
 

Search the Journal web-site through Google:


        Abstract - Issue May 2010, 31 (3)                                                                                                             Back



abstract_15

Comparative studies on toluene removal and pressure drop in

biofilters using different packing materials

 

Hee Wook Ryu1, So Jung Kim1 and Kyung Suk Cho*2

1Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 156 - 743, Korea

2Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120 - 750, Korea

(Received: August 29, 2008; Revised received: February 28, 2009; Accepted: March 02, 2009)

 

Abstract: To select the best available packing material for malodorous organic gases such as toluene and benzene, biofilter performance was compared in biofilters employed different packing materials including porous ceramic (celite), Jeju scoria (lava), a mixture of granular activated carbon (GAC) and celite (GAC/celite), and cubic polyurethane foam (PU). A toluene-degrading bacterium, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia T3-c, was used as the inoculum. The maximum elimination capacities in the celite, lava, and GAC/celite biofilters were 100, 130, and 110 g m-3 hr-1,, respectively. The elimination capacity for the PU biofilter was approximately 350 g m-3 hr-1 at an inlet loading of approximately 430 g m-3 hr-1, which was 2 to 3.5 times higher than for the other biofilters. The pressure drop gradually increased in the GAC/celite, celite and? lava biofilters after 23 day due to bacterial over-growth, and the toluene removal efficiency remarkably decreased with increasing pressure drop. Backwashing method was not effective for the control of biomass in these biofilters. In the PU biofilter, however, backwashing allowed maintenance of a pressure drop of 1 to 3 mm H2O m-1 and a removal efficiency of > 80%, indicating that the PU was the best packing material for toluene removal among the packing materials tested.

Key words: Toluene, Biofilter, Packing material, Pressure drop, Clogging, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

?????????? PDF of full length paper is available online

 

Copyright ? 2010 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).