JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    RnD Division
    Subscription Info
    Contact Journal
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Authoring Guidelines
    Publication Process
    Track Paper Status
 

Search the Journal web-site through Google:


        Abstract - Issue Jan 2008, 29 (1)                                                                                                             Back



paper

Do we need to examine the quantitative data obtained from toxicity

studies for both normality and homogeneity of variance?

Katsumi Kobayashi*1, K. Sadasivan Pillai2, Yuki Sakuratani1, Masaya Suzuki3 and Wang Jie4

1National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (NITE), 2-49-10 Nishihara, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-0066, Japan

2Orchid Research Laboratories Ltd., R & D Centre, Plot No. 476/14, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600 119, India

31st Department of Pathology, Hamamatsu University, School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 432-8012, Japan

4Pesticide Safety Evaluation Center, Shenyang Research Institute of Chemical Industry, No. 8 Shenliao Donglu,

Shenyang Lianing Province 110021, People?s Republic of China

(Received: August 16, 2006 ; Revised received: March 20, 2007 ; Accepted: April 25, 2007)

Abstract: Most of the statistical techniques used to evaluate the data obtained from toxicity studies are based on the assumption that the data show a normal distribution and homogeneity of variance. Literature review on toxicity studies on laboratory animals reveals that in most of the cases homogeneity of variance alone is examined for the data obtained from these studies. But the data that show homogeneity of variance need not always show a normal distribution. In fact, most of the data derived from toxicity studies, including hematological and biochemical parameters show a non-normal distribution. On examining normality of data obtained from various toxicity studies using different normality tests, we observed that Shapiro-Wilk test is more appropriate than Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Lilliefors test, the normal probability paper analysis and Chi square test. But there are situations, especially in the long-term toxicity studies, where normality is not shown by one or more than one of the dosage groups. In this situation, we propose that the data may be analyzed using Dunnett multiple comparison test after excluding the data of the groups that do not show normality. However, the biological relevance of the excluded data has to be carefully scrutinized. We also observed that the tendency of the data to show a normal distribution seems to be related to the age of the animals. Present paper describes various tests commonly used to test normality and their power, and also emphasizes the need of subjecting the data obtained from toxicity studies to both normality and homogeneity tests. A flow chart suggesting the statistical techniques that may be used for both the types of data showing a normal or non-normal distribution is also proposed.

Key words:?? Shapiro-Wilk test, Normality, Normal distribution, Toxicity study, Homogeneity of variance

 

Copyright ? 2008 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).