Effects of
different pretreatments on germination of Prunus
serotina seed sources
Derya Esen*1, Oktay Yildiz1, Murat Sarginci1 and Kani Isik2
1Abant Izzet Baysal University,
Duzce Forestry Faculty, Konuralp
Yerleskesi, Konuralp,
Duzce-81620, Turkey
2Akdeniz University, Faculty of
Arts and Sciences, Biology Department, Antalya-07058, Turkey
(Received:
December 26, 2005 ; Revised received: July 18, 2006 ; Accepted: August 8, 2006)
Abstract: Establishing intensive plantations of fast
growing hardwood tree species that have high market values in the forest
industry can narrow the gap between Turkey’s demand and the supply of
quality hardwood products. Black cherry (P. serotina Ehrh.) is a fast growing hardwood species with a high
market value. Introducing and
intensively growing black cherry (BC) in Turkey may significantly reduce the
country’s quality wood shortage. Adequate seed germination constitutes the
first essential step for successful establishments. In this paper, effects of
different pretreatments, including artificial and natural stratification, on
the seeds of different BC seed sources (SSs) were
studied. Pretreatments had substantial effects on the dormancy breaking and
germination behaviours of the SSs.
Consecutive periods of complex warm and cold artificial stratification regimes
longer than 90 days or natural stratification (where seeds were assumed to be
naturally exposed to this complexity) resulted in best dormancy breaking and,
in turn, germination among all pretreatments. Deeper dormancy and reduced
germination rates of some BC seeds as the altitude of the source increases might
suggest an ecological adaptive strategy of the species. BC may have deeper morphophysiological dormancy than is commonly believed.
Seed size may have a positive effect on seed germination.
Key words: Black cherry, Forestry, Prunus serotina, Seed stratification,
Germination
Â
Copyright © 2007 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the
Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior
permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the
acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the
author(s).
Â